Porcelains have been at the heart of esthetic dentistry since the 1960's with a broad assumption that they are bioinert - not eliciting a reaction from the tissues around them.
Without diving too deep in the science of biomaterials, a bioactive material is one that intentionally elicits a response from adjacent tissues and biocompatability refers to a material that does not cause harm to adjacent tissues. Biocompatibility is not absolute(1) and requires evaluation of a material's interaction with tissues over time. In other words, more complex than this discussion.
Advances in dental ceramics have continued to evolve into what we now call bioceramics. These materials include hydroxyapetitie, bioactive glass and calcium silicates.(2)
One of the earliest bioceramics used in Endodontics was Mineral Trioxide Aggregate - a silicate cement. This bioactive and biocompatible material was unlike anything we had seen before in endodontics. It could be used in a moist environment - actually requiring moisture to set up, did not seem to irritate the adjacent tissues and bone would form right up against it! It did not take long fir this material to be used for root repair (additional example) & apicoectomy retrofills.
With the biocompatible success of this material, and seeing that it clinically created good seal, it wasn't long before we began using this bioceramic for direct pulp capping and using this material to replace traditional apexification/apexogenesis a new type of procedures known as pulpal regeneration.
One of the biggest challenges with the use of MTA was the grey discoloration of the tooth. The grey staining of the tooth created esthetic challenges in the anterior. In effort to address this complication, Tulsa Dentsply developed a white MTA by reducing the aluminoferrite content.
The bioceramic line up has grown since the development of white MTA with additional calcium silicate cement products from Septodont, Brasseler, Avalon Biomed etc. These modern bioceramic materials claim to have the impressive properties of:
- Osteogenicity
- Chemically bond to dentin
- Antibacterial (pH>12)
- Hydrophilic
- Hydroxyapatite producing
- No shrinkage
- Good working/setting time
- Easy delivery systems
Sources:
1. Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Aug;86(2):203-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.117056. PMID: 11514810.
2. Dong X, Xu, X. Bioceramics in Endodontics, Updates and Future Perspectives. Bioengineering. 2023 Mar13;10(3):354.
3. Prognosis of Vital Pulp Therapy on Permanent Dentition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Sabeti, Mohammad et al. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 47, Issue 11, 1683 - 1695
No comments:
Post a Comment